Attorneys who conduct depositions, evidentiary hearings, or trials know that the effectiveness of an examination often depends on the form of the question being asked. Even strong testimony can be undermined by poorly phrased questions that invite objections or fail to elicit clear, admissible answers.

In this practical CLE program, Judge Greenberg draws on extensive judicial and teaching experience to examine the rules of evidence governing common objections to the form of questions. Participants will learn how to recognize and avoid frequent pitfalls, including improper leading questions, vague or ambiguous wording, compound questions, repetitive questioning that prompts an “asked and answered” objection, argumentative examinations, and handling non-responsive witnesses.

Using real-world examples, transcripts, and sample examinations, the course demonstrates how these rules operate in practice and provides attorneys with techniques for conducting more effective witness examinations. While particularly valuable for newer litigators developing courtroom and deposition skills, this program also serves as a useful refresher for experienced practitioners seeking to sharpen their examination techniques.